🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.